"Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!" cries she
With silent lips.
"Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"
I disagree with most of the
pundits who have claimed that the Republicans have put up a mediocre group of
candidates for this year’s Presidential race. I watched one of the debates in
South Carolina and believe that the four remaining candidates showed remarkable
poise and ability.
It is true that not every one
seems “Presidential” but each represents an important position or positions
that the GOP’s eventual candidate would be wise to somehow work into his own
campaign. However, on the issue of immigration I believe that they were all
wrong.
I’m not talking about the absurd
idea of shipping millions of immigrants back to Mexico where they can wait in
line to apply for citizenship. I’m more concerned with the position laid out by
Rick Santorum and seemingly accepted by the others. Santorum himself is the son
of an Italian immigrant. His father came to this country at the age of seven,
and Santorum is proof of how well immigrants can prosper and thrive in this
country.
However, for Santorum citizenship
means respect for the laws of one’s country, and the first act of every illegal
immigrant was to break the law. Neither he nor any of the others ever
considered whether the law itself was just or unjust. Political philosophers
tell us that not only should an unjust law not be obeyed, but also that it must
be opposed.
Does Santorum or anyone else think
the law that prohibited East Germans from going over the Berlin Wall and
leaving their country was just? Does anyone believe that escapees should have
been returned to East Germany because they had broken East German law? Of
course not.
Like Santorum I am a descendant of
Italians who migrated to America over 100 years ago. True, they were legal
immigrants who had to make their way through Ellis Island just like the Irish,
the Germans, the Jews, the Poles, the Slovaks, and all the others who came
through the so-called “Golden Door.” However, if these legal immigrants had
come to this country after 1920 the great majority of them would have been
illegal. What happened? Why did a country that had always kept its doors open
to immigrants suddenly close them?
After the First World War a wave
of prejudice and bigotry swept over this country that led politicians to
severely restrict the flow of immigration. Many of the immigrants like my
Italian ancestors could hardly read and write even in their own language, and
since they were Catholic they were regarded as ignorant and superstitious. They
were called wops and guineas and their crowded streets were believed to be breeding
grounds of crime and depravity.
In the 1920’s racists and
advocates of ethnic purity decided to stem the flow of immigration into this
country. They wanted no more undesirables, especially if they practiced alien
religions like Catholicism and Judaism.
Why should anyone support a law
made during the 1920s that made a mockery of the Statue of Liberty and the
famous poem written by Emma Lazarus.
Why do commentators like Pat
Buchanan believe that the Mexicans who have crossed the borders of our country
in order to find a better life for themselves and their families, will be
different from the earlier immigrants? Last year I attended an early morning
Mass in Princeton, New Jersey on the feast of Our Lady of Guadalupe. The priest
told us that earlier, at 4:00 a.m., 600 Latinos had packed the church for a
prayer service on that great feast. Are these hard working people undesirables?
If the law was different all of
these immigrants could have entered the country peacefully without danger to
life and limb and without employing criminals to guide them. I’m not saying we
should be stupid or impractical. They should have to apply for citizenship and
meet certain criteria. They should not immediately enjoy all the benefits of
citizenship, for citizenship in this country should still be regarded as a
great privilege.
Finally, opening up our doors
again will provide great benefits. It is not just a question of who will cut
our lawns, remove our garbage, or paint our homes, but how will we compete with
China’s huge population with only 300 million people? Who will buy up our
unused housing if our population continues to decline? Don’t immigrants now
rent American apartments, drive American cars, and buy American products in
American stores?
Finally, the pressure on those
states that now bear the brunt of illegal immigration will be alleviated. The
millions of dollars now spent on controlling the Mexican border can be
allocated to other purposes. ###
No comments:
Post a Comment