Kelly Evans on CNBC |
Twice a week I go to a gym in a nearby
Senior residential facility for a light workout. Most of the residents take
exercise classes in the morning so when I go in the afternoon, I am virtually
alone. I like to turn on the TV and watch the business news on CNBC for an
hour. I like CNBC because it is much less political than Fox News, CNN, or
MSNBC. Also, during the commercials the stock ticker keeps streaming at the
bottom of the screen.
I usually watch “The Closing Bell” jointly
anchored by Kelly Evans and Bill Griffith. It is a real plus that Evans and the
other women on the show, while as attractive as those on the other cable news networks,
do not have to expose their legs or show excessive décolletage. They are free
to report the news and interview their guests without appearing as bimbos.
Usually the pace is rapid fire with
guest panelists going back and forth in the limited time available. Evans and
Griffith are intelligent and curious questioners who do a good job of keeping their
guests to the point. Often, the panelists will disagree and it is apparent that
no one has the proverbial crystal ball. Even when they marshal impressive
statistics, it is obvious that these can be interpreted in different ways. One
guest recently argued that the improved earnings of a company would likely
cause its stock to drop in price.
Once in a while, a breath of truth will
come through the torrent of words. Just the other day a panel was discussing
how the proposed cut in the corporate tax rate would affect the airlines. One
commentator suggested that the airline companies might use the tax savings to
buy back their own stock to the benefit of stockholders. But the other panelist
pointed out that the cut in the corporate tax rate will have little effect on
the airlines because they don’t pay tax anyway. What! Even the anchors gasped.
He went on to explain that the airlines had such large loss carryovers that
they would not have any tax liability for years no matter what the rate.
I thought this observation was right on
the money. It should be obvious that rather than give up 35% of their profits corporations
have found ways to shelter those profits from high tax rates. One of those ways
was to shift operations overseas to lower tax countries, a tactic that the
lower rate is designed to make less attractive.
I think most of the opposition to tax
reform comes from people who just hate President Trump and do not want anything
he supports to be successful. The well to do progressives who hate Trump should
ask themselves how Trump has actually hurt them. Has the country really gone to
Hell since his election over a year ago?
So far this year the major stock indexes
have gone up dramatically. The Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) closed
yesterday at 24504 up 24% so far this year. The tech heavy NASDAQ average has
lagged the DJIA but still is up 17.64% this year, and the broad Standard and Poor’s
stock average is up 19%.
I do not want to give President Trump
credit for these gains although his critics will be quick to blame him if the
market goes down next year. I suspect that the increase in stock prices has
little to do with politics. The dramatic rise in the stock market began during
the Obama administration and nothing that Trump or the Federal Reserve have
done has impeded it.
In the first place, with returns on
other investment being so low, where else have people been able to go to gain a
decent return? Secondly, it would appear that the number of public companies is
shrinking. We have high demand for stocks but the supply of eligible companies
is getting lower. Whatever the cause, those who invest in the stock market do
not seem to believe that the country is in bad shape after a year of Trump.
These stock gains have benefitted not
just the rich but everyone. This year has seen record inflows of money into
stock index and hedge funds. A large share of this money comes from pension
funds. In effect, a pension fund that needs to average 8% a year has made two
or three times that amount this year. Theoretically, it could just cash in and
not make anything for another year or two.
People whose retirement savings are in
401k plans or IRAs have seen similar results. Anyone looking at their quarterly
statement will see significant gains this year. The only problem is that their
new contributions will buy fewer shares in their funds.
It could be argued that the poor do not
share in these stock market gains but the poor paid very little tax under the
present tax code, and will pay even less under the new. But business profits
and stock market gains will allow well to do individuals to pay the taxes that
shore up this country’s social service safety net.
###
No comments:
Post a Comment