We had houseguests last week
and so I was not able to watch more than a few bits and pieces of the Democrat
National Convention held this year in Philadelphia, the city of “Brotherly
Love.” From the little I saw I have to conclude that the way the Democrats
presented themselves to the nation was little different from the way the
Republicans did the previous week in Cleveland.
On the final night of each
convention each party’s nominee stood alone on a large stage topped by a
gigantic screen image, and surrounded by a packed house of supporters who
obligingly cheered, rose from their seats, and waved placards at every cue. The
delegates who supposedly represented the rank and file of the party were there
just as window dressing since the contest for the nomination had already been
decided.
In each case the nominee was
introduced by a loving daughter who extolled the virtues and the humanity of
their respective parents. Ironically, even though the nominees appear to despise
each other, their daughters are apparently good friends. Why shouldn’t they be?
Even though the Democrats claim to be the party of the poor and downtrodden,
Chelsea Clinton attended the best private schools in the country, and though
her parents claimed to be “dead broke” when they left the White House sixteen
years ago, they now hob-nob with the nation’s rich and powerful.
Earlier in the week other
family members had come forward to extol the virtues of their loved one. Trump’s
beautiful third wife, Melania, kicked off the Republican convention with an
extremely well-delivered speech that was only marred the day after when it was
discovered that two paragraphs had been lifted from an earlier speech by
Michelle Obama. Speaking of the President’s wife, the Democrats turned to her
to kick off their convention. She is an extremely attractive woman who was
dressed just as finely as Malania, the former supermodel.
Hillary Clinton’s husband
Bill was saved for another night. I did not hear his speech but saw that he
launched into some highly personal remarks about their love and marriage.
Plagiarism did not mar his speech but I wonder if the viewers on TV wondered
about Bill’s sincerity given his many and repeated infidelities.
However, the Republicans
could not match the star power of the Democrats who were able to trot our
Vice-President Joe Biden one night and then President Obama himself. I could
not listen to their speeches but I’m sure they also basked in the adulation of
the crowd. No one remembered that years ago Biden’s hopes for the Presidency
were smashed when he turned out to be a plagiarizer, or that in 2008 Barack
Obama was elected President with hardly any political experience.
Each of the conventions also
featured a former mayor of New York City. Rudy Giuliani, the very popular mayor
noted for his restoration of law and order in the crime ridden city, as well as
for his presence during the 911 attack that destroyed the Twin Towers, gave a
fiery speech in support of Donald Trump. On the other hand, at the Democrat
convention Michael Bloomberg, Giuliani’s successor as Mayor denounced Trump as
a con man and urged voters to favor Hillary Clinton.
Bloomberg’s speech was the
only one I heard in full and while it was a full scale attack on the Republican
nominee, I couldn’t help but feel that Bloomberg is a plus for Trump. Critics
claim that Trump has no political experience but neither did Bloomberg when he
became Mayor of the country’s greatest city. Nevertheless, Bloomberg built on
many of Giuliani’s initiatives and is now generally regarded as one of the
City’s finest mayors. Bloomberg’s qualification was the same as Trump’s. He was
and still is a billionaire businessman. Moreover, Bloomberg admitted the other
night that he was a lifelong Democrat, but changed his party affiliation to
Republican when he decided to run for mayor. Now he calls himself an
Independent.
Years ago when I studied
party politics in eighteenth century England, I discovered that there was
little difference between the leaders of contending parties and factions. They
all came from the same upper class and the major difference was that some held
office and others did not. Those in power, the “Ins”, were determined to stay
in, but those out of power, the “Outs” were determined to supplant those in
power. The “Outs” generally claimed to be champions of the little guy, and
supporters of “popular” causes.
The rich and powerful must
eventually find their way into politics, not just to protect their wealth but
also to satisfy their need for fame and recognition.
Coincidentally, on the Sunday
after the Democrat convention came to a close, most Christian religious
services featured readings that dealt with the themes of vanity and greed. The
words from the Book of Ecclesiastes, "Vanity of vanities...All is vanity,"
set the stage. In the gospel Jesus warned, “take care to guard against all
greed, for
though one may be rich, one's life does not consist of possessions.” He issued
a warning to the rich man who thought he had reached the pinnacle of success.
You
fool, this night your life will be demanded of you,
and
the things you have prepared, to whom will they belong?
In the excerpt from the
letter of the Colossians St. Paul compared greed to idolatry. I thought of
idolatry while viewing both conventions.
###
No comments:
Post a Comment