The news last week contained some items dealing with the
treatment of prisoners of war in different parts of the world. Most shocking
was the mass murder of about 1700 captured Iraqi army soldiers by the Sunni
gunmen overrunning parts of northern Iraq. In China thirteen Moslem terrorists
were quickly tried, convicted and executed for various terrorists attacks this spring.
Finally, here in America five enemy combatants were released from Guantanamo
after more than ten years of captivity in exchange for one American soldier
held by the Taliban in Afghanistan.
It is only with great difficulty that we can even begin to
understand the motivation of the Sunni militants in Iraq. With a relatively
small force of heavily armed men (apparently no women serve in their force)
they have routed an Iraqi army of 200000 and taken control of a number of
cities. Mosul, one of these cities, has a population of 2 million. The images
and videos showing them gunning down captured Shiite soldiers must be designed
as a means to cow others into submission.
Compounding the issue is the 1000-year animosity between
Sunni and Shiite Moslems. This is not just a religious issue. News reports
indicate that for most of those thousand years the Sunnis ruled the area now
known as Iraq. The majority Shiites were a despised lower class. Deceased
dictator Saddam Hussein had kept a lid on these animosities but since his
overthrow the majority Shiites have gained the upper hand with the support of
both the Bush and Obama administrations. Since the American military
withdrawal, however, the rule of law has apparently disappeared in Iraq. On the
battlefield there are no rules of war, no legal forms, and no prison camps. The Sunni gunmen don't seem to care about a "status of forces" agreement.
In China there was a semblance of justice. The terrorist
attacks took place from March through May and a host of perpetrators were
rounded up, brought quickly before a Peoples’ Court, and sentenced. Most
received long jail terms but at least 13 were quickly executed by a government
eager to set an example. It should also be mentioned that the terrorists were
all members of a Moslem tribal minority in China.
Despite the swift and severe nature of the Chinese response
to terrorist attacks, it does seem kind of moderate when compared to the Sunni
example on one extreme and the American example on the other extreme. In the
past weeks the American media has been full of the story of the exchange of
prisoners of war between the Obama administration and the Taliban in
Afghanistan. In exchange for American army sergeant Bob Bergdahl, the Obama
administration agreed to turn over five of the terrorists held for years at the
prison in Guantanamo Bay.
I do not want to go into all the speculation about Sergeant
Bergdahl or the motives of President Obama. Even though the President made a
big deal about the Bergdahl exchange, and held a photo op with the soldier’s
parents in the rose garden, the release has generated a storm of controversy.
I’m sure there will be an investigation of some sort but security or political
reasons may keep the truth from ever being known. Perhaps in the next
Presidential campaign, Hillary Clinton may just ask, “what difference does it
make?”
Rather than focus on Sergeant Bergdahl, I would like to
consider the five enemy combatants or prisoners of war released from
Guantanamo. They were captured on the battlefield in Afghanistan more than ten
years ago. Even though they were not in uniform, they were treated as prisoners
of war. They were not immediately beheaded as some captured Americans were, or
gunned down as the Shiite soldiers were. Eventually, they were shipped to
Guantanamo for interrogation. They may or may not have been tortured for
information but on the whole they have been well fed, clothed, housed, and
treated during their long confinement. Compared to some prisons Guantanamo
seems like a Hilton.
Unlike the terrorists in China, they did not receive a swift
trial or resolution of their cases. I believe that our government even provided
them with teams of lawyers. Incredibly, they were not subjected to trial by a
military court, the traditional and lawful way of dealing with such cases.
During the Obama administration an attempt was made to grant them the rights of
American citizens by trying them in a New York criminal court. Now they have
been released with no guarantee that they will not fight us again.
Some may argue that the lenient treatment received by these
captured terrorists is a sign of American humanity. Yet, it can also be an
incentive to future inhumanity. I’m not just referring to the possibility that
the released terrorists might strike again, or that other terrorists might be
prone to take more hostages. I am not a soldier but I have read much military
history, and I wonder what the response of American soldiers will be to the
release of these prisoners. In the future will soldiers in the field elect to
kill enemy captives rather than take them captive? Why should they allow enemy
fighters who have just blown up their buddies to live to one day fight again?
###
No comments:
Post a Comment