I still remember playing the game
of “Risk” as a child more than 60 years ago. It was, and still is, a popular
board game where the object was to conquer the world. It could be played by two
or more combatants who initially drew cards containing the names of different
countries or regions. Players would plant one of their armies on each country
they had picked and then would proceed to attack neighboring countries by
rolling dice.
Success with the dice was
important but it was still a game of strategy. You could be cautious or daring
and each strategy had its risks. It seemed to me at the time that it was better
to control small areas, protect your home base, and marshal your forces
together rather than spreading yourself too thin over the whole board.
Russia, for example, was so large
that it was divided up into a number of regions with strange sounding names.
Controlling that vast area was virtually impossible until you had gained an
overwhelming superiority over your opponent. I distinctly remember that one of
those regions was called Ukraine. It was completely land-locked and surrounded
by a host of countries from which it could be easily attacked.
Today, I find it hard to believe
that the Wall Street Journal, my favorite newspaper, is beating the drums for a
very aggressive US posture on the Ukraine. It seems that not a day goes by
without an editorial or an op-ed calling for the US to get involved in the
Ukraine. What kind of madness is
this? The Ukraine is a next-door neighbor to Russia and we are about 6000 miles
away. The Ukraine became an independent country with the break up of the Soviet
Union only a short time ago.
Historically, it has always been dominated by its powerful neighbor to
the East.
Nevertheless, ever since it became
an independent republic NATO and the European Union have been trying to
incorporate the Ukraine into their orbit for what reason I cannot say. Both we
and the Europeans have been thumbing their noses at the Russians and literally
forcing them to take action. The Wall Street Journal always applauds when two
companies bid against each other to acquire another company. Yet, when Russia
outbid the Europeans for the Ukraine and its assets, the Journal cried foul.
Now, the Journal and others
demonize Vladimir Putin and call him a dictator. Yet since when have we opposed
dictators, even those near our doorstep? We have allowed a brutal dictatorship
in Cuba for over 60 years, and we will do nothing to topple the one that has
ruled and ruined Venezuela for over a decade. We support practically every
dictator on the continent of Africa.
Despite media attacks on Putin it
would appear that both Russians and Ukrainians today enjoy a greater degree of
freedom than at any time over the past 100 years. Recently former chess
champion and political commentator Gary Kasparov wrote that the way to punish
Putin was to threaten the investments of Russian millionaires in the West. Wealthy
Russians did not buy luxury homes in New York and San Francisco during the Stalinist
era.
In another recent Journal op-ed
Matthew Kaminski argued that the recent revolution in the Ukraine created an
environment that was an embarrassment to the Russian dictator. He mentioned new
Ukrainian leaders who wait on line like everyone else at airports, who take the
subway to work, or who stand in line in the government cafeteria. Kaminski
contrasted such leaders with those in repressive Russia, but when he returns
home from Kiev, he will be hard pressed to find any American politicians flying
economy or taking the subway to work. Is President Obama a dictator because he flies
in luxury aboard Air Force One? I doubt if ultra liberal mayor Di Blasio takes
the subway to work each day.
At about the same time I was
playing “Risk” as a boy President Eisenhower warned against the military
industrial complex in this Nation and also argued that this country should
never get involved in a land war on the continent of Asia. We have repeatedly
ignored this advice to our great harm. Now we are sending planes and war ships into
Lithuania and the Baltic Sea right into Russia’s front yard. This could be far more serious than the
mess we have created in Afghanistan where all we had to deal with was
neighboring Pakistan.
We cannot and should not be the
world’s policeman. When we have tried we have often done more harm than good.
We deposed a dictator in Iraq but does anyone know how many Iraqi lives were
lost in the process? You could even argue that despite their obvious political
differences, our last two Presidents have de-stabilized the entire Middle East.
Do we want to do the same in the great borderland between Europe and Asia? After all, what is NATO, the North
Atlantic Treaty Organization, doing in the Ukraine? Any child looking at a “Risk”
board would see that the Ukraine is far from the North Atlantic.
###
No comments:
Post a Comment