The shut down of the Federal Government a few weeks ago seems to have been almost completely forgotten. Fears of a global economic meltdown have subsided, and most Americans have readily accepted the media mantra that the Tea Party was to blame and that it and the Republican Party have been badly damaged by the debacle. But was the Tea Party to blame?
First, let’s dismiss the attempt
to make Senator Ted Cruz of Texas the arch-villain of the shutdown. Cruz is a
Republican Senator and while he might be somewhat outspoken, he has no actual
power in the Democrat controlled Senate. Moreover, the Senate leadership
refused to allow any votes on the various budget proposals sent to it by the
House of Representatives. In fact, Senate Majority leader, Harry Reid, would
not even allow discussion.
The House of Representatives
actually sent two budget bills up to the Senate but they were dead in the
water. So the shutdown was the result of a conflict between the Republican
controlled House of Representatives and President Obama. In the House the
Speaker of the House, John Boehner, had to walk a tightrope since many
conservative members resisted any compromise with the intransigent President.
Boehner, who obviously could not count on any support from
Democrat members, had difficulty controlling members of his own party. In
particular, the difficulty was with the 50 to 60 Republican members who were
identified with the “Tea Party” although the media liked to call them right
wing radicals. During the controversy it struck me as odd that such a small
minority, most of whom were elected recently, could have such influence.
Nevertheless, the finger pointing,
especially by the media, was all directed at the Tea Party. Why?
I know that most members of
Congress are elected over and over again for almost as long as they want to
serve. Incumbents of either party are re-elected over 95% of the time. But
still the House of Representatives, more than any other part of our government,
is supposed to represent the people of this country. The so-called Tea Party
members did not get their positions by a kind of coup. They were all elected by
constituents in the home states and often by wide majorities. To attack them is
to attack the people who elected them.
Moreover, most of them were
elected in the past two or four years. They must reflect something that is
really going on in the country. There are many other issues that bother
Americans but no one can deny that the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) is the
main issue.
From the first, Obamacare was
suspect. The way it was pushed through Congress was suspect. At that time both
Houses of Congress were controlled by Democrats but even then Democrat
leadership had to resort to foul play to get it passed. Some Senators got special treatment for their states. Also, remember that the
Senate version was different from the House version but that instead of going
through a reconciliation process, the House of Representatives was “deemed” to
have agreed with the Senate version.
Then, the Supreme Court very
kindly saved the proposal by an equal bit of political evasion. The President
had always insisted that the “mandate” for every American to purchase coverage was not a
tax. While Chief Justice Roberts argued that such a mandate was
unconstitutional, he allowed the law to continue by calling the mandate a tax!
Finally, the Administration gave
itself four years to get this new system up and rolling. In that period the Tea
Party came into existence even before it became clear that the implementation
of the overhaul of the Nation’s health care system would be a fiasco.
I know it’s ridiculous to talk
about our Constitution anymore. But as I said above the House of
Representatives was supposed to be the voice of the people. Originally, the
President was elected by an Electoral College chosen by the various states. His
term of office was four years. Senators were not elected by popular vote but
nominated by state legislatures. They were elected for six years. But
Representatives were elected by a direct vote of the people and their terms
were limited to two years in order that they would be more responsive to their
constituents.
In my opinion the Tea Party has
been stigmatized by the ruling class in America, a class made up of politicians,
lobbyists, union leaders, and government employees centered in and around
Washington D. C. In the October 2013 issue of the St. Croix Review, my favorite
journal of opinion, editor Barry MacDonald reviewed a new book, “This Town, Two
Parties and a Funeral,,,” about life inside the D.C. beltway. It is a frightening
story about how the political elites join together to achieve their own
personal goals.
Here is MacDonald’s summation.
Intelligent, observant, caring and involved Americans, on both sides of the political spectrum are bamboozled. We misunderstand when we focus on ideology, because the hearts of the Washington players aren’t invested in ideology—ideology is a tool. The hearts of the players are in self-advancement and in the preservation of the system of self-advancement.
Americans on the left should see that the many programs designed to uplift the poor have worked precisely as designed: the redistributors of money are uplifted, the poor remain poor.
This governing class is not only
out of touch with the American people, but it also doesn’t want to be in touch.
The public uproar over the President’s proposed military action in Syria forced
the President to back down. Fortunately, he was bailed out by Russia’s Vladimir
Putin. That uproar now seems minor compared to the furor over the botched opening
of the ACA and the loss of medical coverage by millions of Americans. Already,
the ruling class is backing down. Who will they blame?
###
###
No comments:
Post a Comment