A recent front-page article in the Connecticut Post,
Bridgeport Connecticut’s local newspaper, highlighted the so-called gender gap
in wages between men and women in prosperous Fairfield County. The article
featured two columns of statistics indicating the different wages of men and
women in various towns in the county. The article was based on a report by the
American Association of University women that used figures from the US Census
bureau.
Interestingly, the article did not list even one incident of
wage discrimination and even quoted a spokesman for the Connecticut Commission
on Human Rights and Opportunities who said, “the number of women who complain
about not getting as much as their male counterparts is small.” Moreover, the
article did mention that the figures did not actually compare salaries of full
time employees working the same job. The report just used averages based on the
salaries of men and women “across companies, industries and job titles.” Nevertheless,
as a headline proclaimed, “Wage Gap still exists in region.”
The report’s statistics could lead to some laughable
conclusions. It would seem that the best place for a woman to work would be
Bridgeport, a city where the average woman makes $35932 per year or about 90% of
what the average man makes. Compare that to her poor sister in nearby Westport
whose average pay of $82052 is only about 50% of what a Westport man earns.
There is an old saying: “Statistics don’t lie, but liars use
statistics.” I would venture to guess that there is little wage discrimination
in Connecticut and that the disparities in income are largely based on choices
that people choose to make. All government employees, for example, work on
gender-neutral pay scales. Teachers, police officers, firefighters, mail
carriers, all get the same pay for the same work. Even the high priced
occupations that the article and accompanying editorial mentioned as going
mainly to men are no longer the exclusive male bastions of the past. The
medical and financial professions have become increasingly open to women and
will become more so since the majority of college graduates today are women. No
modern company would dare to have differing wage scales for men and women.
Why did the editorial complain about the disparity in
incomes in well-to-do communities like New Canaan and Darien? Obviously,
talented well-educated woman choose to live there because of the beautiful
homes, excellent school systems, and crime free streets. To hold the city of
Bridgeport up as a kind of gender paradigm is ludicrous. It is one of the
murder capitols of the state, and its school system is in shambles. Politicians
in Bridgeport should be looking at New Canaan and Darien and ask themselves
what they can do to emulate them.
One of the statistics noted that in both New Canaan and
Darien the number of married women in the work force is only about 40% compared
to a national average of about 60%. While one of the “experts” quoted in the
article referred to the “nostalgic idea of what the family is supposed to look
like,” and called it a “romantic notion,” it still seems to be working very
well in New Canaan and Darien. Compare that romantic notion with the one
espoused years ago by Murphy Brown and see the devastation that single
motherhood has brought to the lives of so many single mothers and their
children in cities like Bridgeport.
Finally, the editorial in the Connecticut Post commenting on the article could be considered a little hypocritical. Five of the six chief employees listed on the paper's masthead are men.
Finally, the editorial in the Connecticut Post commenting on the article could be considered a little hypocritical. Five of the six chief employees listed on the paper's masthead are men.
###
No comments:
Post a Comment